<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikiversies</title>
	<link>http://www.outbursts.org/2005/12/06/wikiversies/</link>
	<description>Apologia kai Polemikos</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: extremist</title>
		<link>http://www.outbursts.org/2005/12/06/wikiversies/#comment-539</link>
		<author>extremist</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.outbursts.org/2005/12/06/wikiversies/#comment-539</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I've never tried to contribute, but I've read a lot of the articles and have learned a lot from them.  There seems to be a genuine commitment to a neutral point of view and to verifiability.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example, the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_McCarthy"&gt;McCarthy&lt;/a&gt; article is surprisingly neutral and informative given the controversial nature of the subject.  The same is true of the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_forgery"&gt;Nigerian yellowcake document forgery&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_forgery#See_also"&gt;related articles&lt;/a&gt;.  The yellowcake entry is also what led me to &lt;a href="http://www.factcheck.org/article222.html"&gt;this gem&lt;/a&gt;.  It would be hard to find a more complete and balanced account in any single mainstream media source than what is available at Wikipedia.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Check your inbox.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never tried to contribute, but I&#8217;ve read a lot of the articles and have learned a lot from them.  There seems to be a genuine commitment to a neutral point of view and to verifiability.</p>

<p>For example, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_McCarthy">McCarthy</a> article is surprisingly neutral and informative given the controversial nature of the subject.  The same is true of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_forgery">Nigerian yellowcake document forgery</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_forgery#See_also">related articles</a>.  The yellowcake entry is also what led me to <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/article222.html">this gem</a>.  It would be hard to find a more complete and balanced account in any single mainstream media source than what is available at Wikipedia.</p>

<p>Check your inbox.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baron</title>
		<link>http://www.outbursts.org/2005/12/06/wikiversies/#comment-537</link>
		<author>Baron</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.outbursts.org/2005/12/06/wikiversies/#comment-537</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know that it does work.  In my experience, the "volunteers" that are the last line of defense with respect to what is posted, seem to let a lot of leftist stuff slide while being pretty picky about conservative slants. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I could be wrong, but that is my experience.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you don't mind, shoot me an email at the above address.  I have a couple of questions for you...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Best!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that it does work.  In my experience, the &#8220;volunteers&#8221; that are the last line of defense with respect to what is posted, seem to let a lot of leftist stuff slide while being pretty picky about conservative slants. </p>

<p>I could be wrong, but that is my experience.</p>

<p>If you don&#8217;t mind, shoot me an email at the above address.  I have a couple of questions for you&#8230;</p>

<p>Best!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
